Ben, who is 19 years old, applies for a job as a clerk in a goods store. The store manager is impressed with Ben's speaking skills and says that he would like to hire him, subject to reference checks. Later, the manager calls Ben and says that he will not be hired. On checking his references with a former employer, the manager found out that Ben was convicted of careless driving. Has the store manager violated Ben's human rights by refusing to hire him?
🧠 Тематика вопроса:
Данная дисциплина охватывает ключевые аспекты гражданского судопроизводства, включая спорные моменты и актуальные правовые коллизии. Она позволяет углубленно изучить современные процессуальные механизмы, анализировать судебную практику и вырабатывать навыки эффективного ведения дел. Особое внимание уделяется новейшим тенденциям в законодательстве, а также стратегиям защиты интересов сторон в условиях меняющейся правовой реальности. Курс формирует у обучающихся системный подход к решению сложных процессуальных задач.
Варианты ответа:
- Yes, the manager has violated Ben's human rights. Discrimination in hiring based on having a record of ground is prohibited
- No, the manager didn’t violate Ben’s human rights as Ben’s offence is related to the job duties he would have to do
- No, the manager didn’t violate Ben’s human rights as it’s up to the manager to decide who should be hired and who should not
Ответ будет доступен после оплаты
📚 Похожие вопросы по этой дисциплине
- Stacy and several of her friends play in a women's hockey league at the skate rink. Quite frequently, the male rink attendants don’t give them their full allotted ice time. The attendants make jokes on the women. Stacy thinks that their rights are violated. She has even complained but the manager has done nothing and supported men. Have the rink attendants violated the young women's human rights?
- Imagine that in 2024 you will be president of your country. What branch will you represent? What will be your powers?
- The constitution is the main legal act of the State. It lays down the formation of a system of society and establishes the state structure, the order and justification of the idea of representatives, executive and judicial authorities, the electoral system, the rights and obligations of the state, society and citizens. Can it be argued that any constitution is the constitution of a state or society exclusively?
- The defendant had voluntarily consumed drugs to calm his nerves. Under the influence of the drugs, he had started shooting in the cottage in which he had been living, but claimed to have been unable to remember anything after taking the drugs. The defendant was convicted of causing criminal damage being reckless as to whether life would be endangered, following the trial judge’s direction to the jury that self-induced intoxication was not available by way of defence to a basic intent crime. The defendant appealed. What is the Court’s decision?
- The defendant decided to kill his sister. He bought a knife and a bottle of strong alcohol which he drank to give himself “Dutch Courage”. Then he killed his sister. He subsequently claimed that he was so drunk that he did not know what he was doing, or possibly even that the drink had brought on a latent psychopathic state so that he was insane at the time of the killing. What was the Court’s decision?