Mary had therapy sessions. She found out that the psychologist sent copies of her case notes to the insurance carrier responsible for reimbursement and that therapist should not have revealed this information. Client reported psychologist to the APA Ethics Committee for violating confidentiality principles. Psychologist explained to Ethics Committee that any client understands that their confidentiality may be breached when using an insurance company for third-party reimbursement due to administrative and professional peer review. Nonetheless, psychologist never informed client of this risk before therapy began, rather, he assumed client “must understand” the protocol. Think of the Ethics Committee adjudication.
🧠 Тематика вопроса:
Данная дисциплина охватывает ключевые аспекты гражданского судопроизводства, включая спорные моменты и актуальные правовые коллизии. Она позволяет углубленно изучить современные процессуальные механизмы, анализировать судебную практику и вырабатывать навыки эффективного ведения дел. Особое внимание уделяется новейшим тенденциям в законодательстве, а также стратегиям защиты интересов сторон в условиях меняющейся правовой реальности. Курс формирует у обучающихся системный подход к решению сложных процессуальных задач.
Варианты ответа:
- The Ethics Committee determined that psychologist didn’t violate the confidentiality ethical standard by not informing client of the limits of confidentiality prior to treatment
- The Ethics Committee determined that psychologist violated the confidentiality ethical standard by not informing client of the limits of confidentiality prior to treatment
- The Ethics Committee determined that psychologist didn’t violate the confidentiality ethical standard as there is non-confidentiality prior to treatment
Ответ будет доступен после оплаты
📚 Похожие вопросы по этой дисциплине
- Analyze the following case: Therapist sent a third billing notice to a slow-to- pay client’s fax machine in her office but client did not report to work that day. The bill was titled “psychological services rendered” and handwritten in large print was “Third Notice – OVERDUE!!” with client’s name. This notice sat in an open access mail tray of the busy office all day. Was is reasonable? Is it allowed to send private material in such a manner?
- Rachel buys a commercial welding machine for her building business. A few weeks later, it breaks down. Can Rachel get a remedy from the store he bought it from?
- Susan buys a cup of coffee and accidentally spills it at Kate’s bar. What must Kate do to fix the problem?
- You are a lawyer. In Liza’s electronics shop in the Russia Federation Ivan buys an expensive TV-set. Three weeks after the 12-month manufacturer’s warranty expires, the TV-set stops working. Must Liza give Ivan a remedy?
- Judy owns a clothing retail store. One of her customers returns a T-shirt because it doesn’t fit her. Does Judy have to give her customer a different size or a refund?