Suppose a large city has several power stations which all emit CO2. The government wants to reduce CO2 emissions, but knows that it will cost some power stations more than others to reduce their emissions. In order to secure the most reduction from the stations which would find it cheapest to cut back, which of the following policies would be best?
🧠 Тематика вопроса:
Курс направлен на изучение ключевых принципов и методов, необходимых для понимания и применения современных технологий в профессиональной деятельности. В рамках программы рассматриваются теоретические основы, практические аспекты и актуальные тенденции, позволяющие развить навыки анализа и решения задач. Особое внимание уделяется междисциплинарному подходу, что способствует формированию комплексного видения предметной области. Учебные материалы включают кейсы, интерактивные задания и примеры из реальной практики.
Варианты ответа:
- A regulation limiting how much CO2 a power station can emit per megawatt of electricity generated
- A tax on electricity
- A tax on emissions of CO2
- Giving power stations the property right to emit CO2, and relying on people affected to bribe them to cut back
Ответ будет доступен после оплаты
📚 Похожие вопросы по этой дисциплине
- Return to the city in the last question. Suppose the government wishes to reduce CO2 emissions but does not want to measure them. Which of the following policies would be best?
- Which of the following statements is true?
- Which of the following statements about rational expectations is false?
- Consider a fishing ground. Which of the following statements is false?
- Which of the following problems may be caused by asymmetric information? It may lead to an adverse selection of used cars being offered for sale It may lead to an adverse selection of borrowers applying for loans at a bank It may lead to an adverse selection of drivers applying for comprehensive car insurance