Suppose the labour market is away from equilibrium, with unemployment above the natural rate. The new Keynesian view of inflation and unemployment offers several reasons why the labour market can stay away from equilibrium for long periods. Which of the following is not one of these reasons?
🧠 Тематика вопроса:
Курс направлен на изучение ключевых принципов и методов, необходимых для понимания и применения современных технологий в профессиональной деятельности. В рамках программы рассматриваются теоретические основы, практические аспекты и актуальные тенденции, позволяющие развить навыки анализа и решения задач. Особое внимание уделяется междисциплинарному подходу, что способствует формированию комплексного видения предметной области. Учебные материалы включают кейсы, интерактивные задания и примеры из реальной практики.
Варианты ответа:
- Efficiency wages may hold wages below the equilibrium level
- Workers may resist wage cuts which reduce their wages below those paid to other workers in the same occupation
- Prices may be sticky downwards in some markets because consumers prefer stable prices
- Prices may be sticky downwards in some markets because consumers may judge quality by price
Ответ будет доступен после оплаты
📚 Похожие вопросы по этой дисциплине
- Suppose the CAP has imposed a tariff on the import of a certain foodstuff from outside the EU, and suppose that EU consumers always pay a price equal to the rest of the world price plus the tariff. Which of the following events would not lead to a higher price for EU consumers?
- Suppose the CAP reduces the tariff on imports of a certain foodstuff from outside the EU. Which of the following statements is false?
- Suppose the government introduces a prohibition on the supply or purchase of some substance. Assuming that some suppliers and some users ignore the law, which of the following could not occur?
- There are many reasons why a poor country may fail to catch up with a rich neighbour. Which of the following is not one of these reasons?
- Which of the following statements about the incidence of a specific tax is false?