The distinction between Public and Private Law is a purely academic debate, nevertheless, it also affects legal practice. There are areas of law, which may not fit into distinction of Public or Private Law. Study the following case: An employment inspector investigates workplace safety, checking all the equipment. The inspector investigates workplace incidents, and conducts workplace inspections to evaluate compliance. Decide whether it falls into the category of Public or Private law.
🧠 Тематика вопроса:
Данная дисциплина охватывает ключевые аспекты гражданского судопроизводства, включая спорные моменты и актуальные правовые коллизии. Она позволяет углубленно изучить современные процессуальные механизмы, анализировать судебную практику и вырабатывать навыки эффективного ведения дел. Особое внимание уделяется новейшим тенденциям в законодательстве, а также стратегиям защиты интересов сторон в условиях меняющейся правовой реальности. Курс формирует у обучающихся системный подход к решению сложных процессуальных задач.
Варианты ответа:
- It falls in the category of Private law as considers the interests of the individuals
- It falls in the category of Public law as considers the interests of the society
- It falls in the category of Public and Private law as considers the interest of the society and the individuals
Ответ будет доступен после оплаты
📚 Похожие вопросы по этой дисциплине
- Mary had therapy sessions. She found out that the psychologist sent copies of her case notes to the insurance carrier responsible for reimbursement and that therapist should not have revealed this information. Client reported psychologist to the APA Ethics Committee for violating confidentiality principles. Psychologist explained to Ethics Committee that any client understands that their confidentiality may be breached when using an insurance company for third-party reimbursement due to administrative and professional peer review. Nonetheless, psychologist never informed client of this risk before therapy began, rather, he assumed client “must understand” the protocol. Think of the Ethics Committee adjudication.
- Analyze the following case: Therapist sent a third billing notice to a slow-to- pay client’s fax machine in her office but client did not report to work that day. The bill was titled “psychological services rendered” and handwritten in large print was “Third Notice – OVERDUE!!” with client’s name. This notice sat in an open access mail tray of the busy office all day. Was is reasonable? Is it allowed to send private material in such a manner?
- Rachel buys a commercial welding machine for her building business. A few weeks later, it breaks down. Can Rachel get a remedy from the store he bought it from?
- Susan buys a cup of coffee and accidentally spills it at Kate’s bar. What must Kate do to fix the problem?
- You are a lawyer. In Liza’s electronics shop in the Russia Federation Ivan buys an expensive TV-set. Three weeks after the 12-month manufacturer’s warranty expires, the TV-set stops working. Must Liza give Ivan a remedy?