Assuming that everyone is law-abiding, which of the following would not reduce the quantity traded in a market?
🧠 Тематика вопроса:
Курс направлен на изучение ключевых принципов и методов, необходимых для понимания и применения современных технологий в профессиональной деятельности. В рамках программы рассматриваются теоретические основы, практические аспекты и актуальные тенденции, позволяющие развить навыки анализа и решения задач. Особое внимание уделяется междисциплинарному подходу, что способствует формированию комплексного видения предметной области. Учебные материалы включают кейсы, интерактивные задания и примеры из реальной практики.
Варианты ответа:
- The imposition of an effective price ceiling
- The removal of an effective price floor
- The imposition of a supply-side quantity control
- The imposition of a demand-side quantity control
Ответ будет доступен после оплаты
📚 Похожие вопросы по этой дисциплине
- Suppose the government introduces a specific tax of £5 a unit on a product which has sloping supply and demand curves. Which of the following statements about the resulting curve S+tax is true?
- On a graph showing the effects of an ad valorem tax, where do we find the price received by producers?
- Suppose the labour market is away from equilibrium, with unemployment above the natural rate. The new Keynesian view of inflation and unemployment offers several reasons why the labour market can stay away from equilibrium for long periods. Which of the following is not one of these reasons?
- Suppose the CAP has imposed a tariff on the import of a certain foodstuff from outside the EU, and suppose that EU consumers always pay a price equal to the rest of the world price plus the tariff. Which of the following events would not lead to a higher price for EU consumers?
- Suppose the CAP reduces the tariff on imports of a certain foodstuff from outside the EU. Which of the following statements is false?